My tweets
- @JoeyMcAllister Something bigger indeed. *WINK WINK* in reply to JoeyMcAllister 2 hrs ago
- Really dude? I saw you stare at the cart corral before you left your cart in the lot. It was only another 40 feet. Really? 4 hrs ago
- Took the Droid X to Verizon to gery checked out. We wiped it to be sure. Still waiting for backup assistant. Ugh. 5 hrs ago
- @megatronzinski Hey. Thanks. America. in reply to megatronzinski 19 hrs ago
- More updates...
Blog Archives
Blogroll
Archive for November, 2008
-
Mumbai, Terror, and Response
Posted on November 26, 2008 | View CommentsI’ve been following the mess in Mumbai for the past few hours. As usual, Hashtags represents the best and most live way to keep up-to-date: http://hashtags.org/tag/mumbai. Even though it’s getting a lot of media play, I think it’s important to remember the rather peculiar “ordinariness” of the day’s events.We gasped in America when the London transport system was bombed in 2005. Londoners recovered rather quickly and went about their daily lives. They had been used to periodic terrorist attacks courtesy of the Irish Republican Army. 7/7 was really nothing new to them.
The same goes for every time we hear about a seemingly random car bomb in Iraq. That is simply the way things have been. There are children growing up in that country who have never known stability. India is no exception. We blogged at the University of Denver Interfaith Student Alliance a little bit ago about India’s interfaith history, and the times when the calm has been shattered by selfish, violent acts.
Does anyone even remember the bombs in New Delhi back in October? If you live in a place like India, where sporadic politio-religious violence happens fairly often, you might not. The events taking place in Mumbai today and tonight are “scaled” for us largely because of the media exposure (thank you Web 2.0), but it always amazes me what it must be like to live in a place where such things happen fairly often. I hope that both Mumbai and India can get back on track and work to make sure that attacks like this don’t happen in the future.
-
Trivial Pursuits?
Posted on November 19, 2008 | View CommentsSo I teamed up with some friends of mine from the Korbel School to compete in the first ever Institute of International Education Denver WorldQuest trivia competition. It was sweet, not least of all because my team won. Actually, we tied with the IIE’s own team, but they were just doing it for fun. Plus, they had three Fulbright scholars from three different continents! We won Premier memberships and a VIP happy hour. Sweet!
The questions ranged from identifying Angela Merkel to figuring out which countries DON’T border China. The last round was “World Languages.” I got excited because my undergrad work was in language and linguistics and such. One of the questions asked us to identify the number of different ways of expressing the Japanese language. I knew before I saw the multiple choice that it was 4. Not only that, but I knew that they were called Kanji, Katakana, Hiragana and Romaji. We got the question right, but it left me wondering: Why on earth do I know that?
I don’t speak Japanese, and probably never will (it’s about 8th place in my list of languages to learn). I’ve always viewed the acquisition of knowledge (even the “trivial”) as something like the Boy Scout motto. Be prepared. I guess I keep hoping that one day I’ll bump into some eccentric millionaire who’s desperately searching for someone to explain to him the importance of the Convivencia or the history of Ireland or the distance from the earth to the sun or the number of languages in Papua New Guinea or the way to make a teabag float in midair.
If I never meet that eccentric millionaire, then are all these bits of information, some a mile wide and an inch deep and some and inch wide and a mile deep, really worth learning?
-
Popular Sovereignty
Posted on November 17, 2008 | View CommentsJust finished a small write-up about the analogy between individuals and states from the Renaissance to the 18th century as well as an analysis of what this means for contemporary international relations. It’s pretty messy – I may repost a cleaner final version someday.
-
Why We Can’t Stand Still
Posted on November 15, 2008 | View CommentsMy instructor in my Modern Political Theory class was discussing how political theory, like any good idea, is generally applied retrospectively to a given situation. We aren’t usually able to see patterns until after the fact. Not that this makes theory worthless, of course; we gain a greater appreciation of what has happened, and we can certainly learn about possible future occurrences of that given situation.My instructor did point out the need for theory to be as proactive as it possibly could though, by positing this thought-experiment: “What if, tomorrow, science proves that I’m actually standing on the other side of the room?” It was a ridiculous idea, but not outside the realm of possibility.
We already know that time is relative, perhaps even more so than we would like to admit. It is, as I’ve long held, a social construct more than an empirical thing (I still show up early to everything, though). We can, if we like, view time as everything happening all at once, since there’s no feasible end or beginning point for what we call “time.” Even more disturbing/inspiring is quantum mechanics, which allows us to think really, REALLY big by looking at things that are very, very small. I offer the following easy explanation of superposition theory:
By this reasoning, my instructor most certainly could have been on the other side of the room, at the exact same time that he was where we perceived him to be. Using the aforementioned notion of time as relative, he could have been inhabiting both positions at different times as well. Whew. We can’t stand still because, depending how you look at it, we are everywhere at once.
I love this stuff, but you can’t think deeply about it for too long or your brain will explode.
-
Sharia and the State
Posted on November 13, 2008 | View CommentsI’ve finished up a review of Noah Feldman’s The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State. It’s not actually all review – there’s analysis, too. It definitely would not fit here, so it’s been published through GoogleDocs. Take a peek, eh?